6.13.2006

q.o.t.d.

After all, in a society that values its people more as consumers of products than as civic-minded citizens, the fact that the masses have been kept in a state of suspended intellectual animation is hardly surprising.
--- Tim Wise, Counterpunch

soy el capitan!

ha! my newest favorite ad of all time... beckenbauer !!??

6.09.2006

germany 4 costa rica 2

i love the smell of football in the morning. world cup 2006 is off to a great start. though it seemed they only scored everytime i got up to go to the kitchen. over 1 BILLION people were tuned in to the opening. incredible. i just love it.

6.07.2006

holy shit

i mean, i knew i was stressed this year between work and the unsuccessful search for more work. what i didn't know was that my symptoms are classic burn out!

taken from a scientific american mind article:

"The term "burnout syndrome" was coined in the early 1970s by Herbert J. Freudenberger, a New York psychoanalyst. Freudenberger had noticed that his own job, which was once so rewarding, had come to leave him feeling only fatigued and frustrated. Then he noticed that many of the physicians around him had, over time, turned into depressive cynics. As a result, those doctors increasingly treated their patients coldly and dismissively.

Freudenberger soon began looking at examples outside of health care — and found similar cases in many professions. Afflicted people suffered from mood fluctuations, disturbed sleep and difficulty concentrating. Accompanying the mental distress were physical ailments such as backaches or digestive disorders. Freudenberger defined burnout syndrome as a state of mental and physical exhaustion caused by one's professional life."

how bout being broke and unemployed to bring that on.

to see or not to see?

so i stumbled upon this woman's work and was immedialtely enthralled. i guess i miss MIT or i have a soft spot for cute researchers on the cutting edge of neuroscience. anyway, i'm going to simulate one of her neatest tricks.

1. open this pdf file
2. go to page 5 (to see neutral woman and angry man images)
3. view the images at 100% zoom
4. zoom out in steps all the way to, say, 10% or even lower

the images gradually change from one to the other!

why? well you can read the paper to find out. basically they are hybrid images combining the two sets of information (angry man and neutral woman), one set filtered to contain only "low spatial frequencies in Fourier space" and the other set filtered to contain only high spatial frequencies. (in layman's terms, it's blurry or sharp.) anyway, staring at close range, high frequency or sharp features are more noticeable, masking any information encoded in the large scale, whereas once you move far away sharp features are less dominant allowing the low frequency information to be drawn out, perceived, if you will. it's sort of the same principle as squinting to see a pixelated picture better.

recently a neurobiologist at Harvard Med noticed those underlying mechanisms at work in the mona lisa painting. whereas art historians and the like (cue marc's eye roll of phycisist's condescension) argue back and forth about mona lisa's enigmatic smile, said scientist proved that mona lisa is both smiling and not smiling at the same time , albeit at different spatial frequencies because of some clever shading at the corners of the mouth. she predicted this by looking directly and indirectly at the painting, then proved it by taking low and high pass filters of the image. ha! of course it would take a scientist to resolve an art "mystery."

6.06.2006

quota

i only found out last night but apparently the government reached quota on petitioning for H1-B work visas over a week ago, more than two months earlier than the cap date last year. this left a lot of internationals fucked. some graduates even report having job offers rescinded. of course this development implies that i myself am unemployed with certainty. and the interviews i had gotten for june are now worthless and have to be cancelled. the finality of it all hit like a wall yesterday, a week before i would have heard back from the company that was trying to open a late-start position just for me.

hooray reality.

but what does this imply for the blog? well. not curtains. definitely not certain death. but certain dearth probably. as the internet don't grow on trees in the third world. hahaha, i find it funny that i am worried about not having regular internet access when i should be thinking of finding a place to live in trinidad! i literally can't fit in the old apt. no desire to sleep on a couch or have to *share* a room *smaller* than my current studio with another twenty something year old. i'm thinking of crashing by an aunt for a while. see if i can get work. and then see what happens from there. lots of seeing to do. and perhaps some rum and marijuana to dull the pain of the impending tedium. cuz i'll tell ya, there is nothing interesting to do. on the brighter side, i will not be prevented from entering clubs, or be mistaken for an employee working the aisles at target, based on my appearance. ooh... appearance. i will be brown again. one thing to smile about.

6.05.2006

kissinger on china

You’ve become one of the world’s great experts on China since you first visited there in 1971. There seems to be a looming problem with China, as there was with Japan ten or fifteen years ago. Is China becoming so powerful it will endanger U.S. interests?

In the United States, there’s always a temptation to believe that we can write the course of history, that it’s entirely up to us to decide whether a country is powerful, less powerful, whether it is helpful to us or not. And one of the fundamental lessons we have to learn is that we are moving into a world in which a lot of things are happening that we cannot control. We can shape, but we cannot prevent China from becoming a major country. We can slow it down and then pay the consequences ten to twenty years down the road, and policymakers have every right to consider that. But fundamentally, China is going to emerge as a major power in Asia. Secondly, the center of gravity of the world is going to shift from the Atlantic to the Pacific. Those are realities.

Then we have to ask the policy question: Do we want to slow down that process at the risk of producing a generation of Chinese considering us to be the biggest obstacle of their national endeavors? Or do we want to signal an attitude of cooperation while defending specific American interests when they are being challenged? That we must always do. I tend to lean toward the second course. I believe also that a new equilibrium will emerge in Asia, and if we want to be relevant to that, it is wiser to do it from a posture of cooperation with China than from a posture of trying to recreate the Cold War, because in the second course, all the countries around China will be forced to choose and we will be blamed for putting them in a position where they are forced to choose. It will weaken our position in those countries, rather than strengthen it.

[from http://www.cfr.org/publication/8255/kissinger.html]

marc = warlike?

to kill time while waiting on a phone interview at work marc reads US military articles... why? because war will continue to be fundamental to the human condition as long as we insist on maintaining national or cultural differences in a finite resource world. why this particular article? it was about updating the principles of war. but really i was just amused that it's title started "NEO-STRATEGICON."


"In security matters, intellectual stasis could be fatal. The great danger today, for example, is assuming that the irregular warfare of current conflicts is the inescapable template for future wars... Finally, we must continue to search for peace even as we prepare for war. We can hope that the melancholy belief that "only the dead have seen the end of war" is wrong, so long as we always realize that hope is not a principle of war."

6.02.2006

today's catholic news

church sanctioned researchers now say that evolution is not in discord with the postulates of catholicism. men may have evolved from monkeys but at some point "god infused man [with a] ...soul." probably some 6000 years ago. it is reported that god did in fact blow his "breath of the spirit" into man, instantaneously "enlightening [his complexion] and opening [widening] his eyes." when asked about the origin of women the church replied, "who?"

after some hurried consultation, cardinals in rome decided that god had made man with too many ribs and each man had to get rid of one or two. "there was a rib feast at which all men cast their surplus viscera-protectae" into a hot water spring in eden. apparently women may have evolved from this sea of cartilaginous tissue and bone. whether god infused women with souls the church researchers would not say. "it may have been that he tried to but perhaps he was out of breath at the time," said one cardinal. "what is certain is that satan himself designed the clitoris."

overheard in Mmail

Mmail recipient: "ok, since you-you is the same person as me-me, if I pinch the Marc that shows up in SF and I feel it, then I know it is you-you and not clone-you. Unless *I* am really clone-me. Not sure how I would know that. I guess the Marc would have to pinch me to find out. would that work?"

M: "the only way to know for sure how much of a clone you are is to take a "ς"* measurement.*ς is a measurement of eye-chinkyness. it is alleged that as you clone more clones from clones, their eye-chinkyness increases in proportion with the decrease in soul percentage which falls off like e^-N where N is the degree of cloning. this implies that as you get to N=5, your clone subject is almost a fully formed soulless asian."

half human/half ecosystem

human beings are in some sense symbiotic with other life organisms. which fits in nicely with all my beliefs about interbeing and humankind being a process of the universe. but i wonder what religious folk would say about that? probably "microbes in the human body? well, clearly that is original sin!" or something like that. anyway...

excerpts from Article:

"In a study published in the June 2 issue of Science , scientists at The Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR) and their colleagues describe and analyze the colon microbiome, which includes more than 60,000 genes--twice as many as found in the human genome. Some of these microbial genes code for enzymes that humans need to digest food, suggesting that bacteria in the colon co-evolved with their human host, to mutual benefit."

"How many unique bacterial genera or species exist in the colon community? By comparison to the outside world, Gill suspects the human gut is at least as complex as our soils or seas."

6.01.2006

strange creatures found in israeli cave

previously unknown creatures found in sunless underwater cave ecosystem in israel...

see Article

contrary to popular belief the creatures have not been swimming around lost in the cave system for 400 years questioning their existence or concocting a theistic system of belief.